A RetroSearch Logo

Home - News ( United States | United Kingdom | Italy | Germany ) - Football scores

Search Query:

Showing content from http://news.php.net/php.internals/66548 below:

[VOTE] Integrating Zend Optimizer+ into the PHP distribution

Re: [VOTE] Integrating Zend Optimizer+ into the PHP distribution
Philip,

Shouldn't we be focusing on how this makes PHP better? And not nitpick
> about a percentage point or two?
>

Well, this passed with 62.8%. Property accessors failed with 60.7%. The
target for acceptance is 66.6%. So 3.8% is enough to throw away, but 5.9%
isn't?

I think the point of this discussion is that rules are rules for a reason.
You can't be high and holy and deny one RFC judiciously, and then hand-wave
and say the next RFC doesn't matter because the intention is there (or
whatever rationale is).

Either we stick to the rules, or we throw them out and install a BDFL.
Either way, I don't care. I just think the current
they-sometimes-matter-depending-on-who-and-when-it-is-raised stance is
deeper than BS, it's dangerous and is actively turning away contributors
(as well as harming the project)...

Anthony
Thread (112 messages)

RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue

Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo

HTML: 3.2 | Encoding: UTF-8 | Version: 0.7.3