On Tue, 9 Aug 2005 12:03:28 +0200 (CEST) derick@php.net (Derick Rethans) wrote: > On Tue, 9 Aug 2005, Weyert de Boer wrote: > > > >6.0 if the Namespaces patch makes it in, 5.5 with Unicode > > >only? ;) > > > > Namespaces patch is a patch so it's fine for version 5.5, if > > you would ask me. I would see the unicode support as a bigger > > step forward. > > I'm not sure what you guys are discussing here, but it's > definitely not up to any non-contributor to decide which version > number we pick. And making it dependable on whether some patch > goes in or not doesn't make sense at all. A minimum of respect does not cost anything. The author of this patch invest a lot of time in it. A major version increment can (always?) depend on what it will have in. It can be a patch, a new extension or a deep change like unicode. Regards, --Pierre
Thread (32 messages)
- Tue, 09 Aug 2005 08:41:07 +0000
- Jani TaskinenTue, 09 Aug 2005 09:06:20 +0000
- Sebastian BergmannTue, 09 Aug 2005 09:06:12 +0000
- David ZülkeTue, 09 Aug 2005 09:46:19 +0000RE: [PHP-DEV] PHP 5.5 or 6.0
- Pierre-Alain JoyeTue, 09 Aug 2005 10:04:38 +0000Re: PHP 5.5 or 6.0
- Derick RethansTue, 09 Aug 2005 10:47:50 +0000Re: Re: PHP 5.5 or 6.0
- Pierre-Alain JoyeTue, 09 Aug 2005 10:52:32 +0000
- Ilia AlshanetskyTue, 09 Aug 2005 14:07:07 +0000
- Andi GutmansTue, 09 Aug 2005 19:38:31 +0000
- Sara GolemonTue, 09 Aug 2005 17:43:03 +0000Re: PHP 5.5 or 6.0
- Andi GutmansTue, 09 Aug 2005 19:25:27 +0000
- Zeev SuraskiWed, 10 Aug 2005 15:16:31 +0000
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.3