On Mar 3, 4:55 pm, toby <t... at telegraphics.com.au> wrote: > > where you have to store data and > > "relational data" Data is neither relational nor unrelational. Data is data. Relationships are an artifact, something we impose on the data. Relations are for human convenience, not something inherent in the data itself. > > perform a large number of queries. > > Why does the number matter? Have you ever had to make a large number of queries to an XML database? In some ways, an XML database is the counterpart to a relational database in that the data descriptions constitute the relations. However, since the search is to the XML elements, and you can't construct indicies for XML databases in the same way you can with relational databases, a large search can take much longer that you might expect. CC.
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4