A RetroSearch Logo

Home - News ( United States | United Kingdom | Italy | Germany ) - Football scores

Search Query:

Showing content from http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-list/2010-March/720244.html below:

Docstrings considered too complicated

Docstrings considered too complicated Docstrings considered too complicatedAndreas Waldenburger usenot at geekmail.INVALID
Mon Mar 1 15:29:54 EST 2010
On Mon, 01 Mar 2010 18:42:17 +0100 Jean-Michel Pichavant
<jeanmichel at sequans.com> wrote:

> Andreas Waldenburger wrote:
> [snip]
> > Back in the software world: Those guys write code that works. It
> > does what it's supposed to do. Why should we care where they put
> > their comments?
> >
> >   
> If you've bought the code and want to maintain it, you'd better make 
> sure it's possible.
> 
Fair enough, but we don't want to maintain it.


> By the way, the ISO 9001 standard ask for your out sourced processing
> to be compliant with your QA objectives, so if you care about your
> code, then you should care for the code you buy.
> 
We did not buy code. If it were written in C or such, we would never
get to see it.

It's not our concern.

/W

-- 
INVALID? DE!


More information about the Python-list mailing list

RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue

Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo

HTML: 3.2 | Encoding: UTF-8 | Version: 0.7.4