On 2010-03-01 11:34 , Patrick Maupin wrote: > On Mar 1, 11:13 am, Robert Kern<robert.k... at gmail.com> wrote: >> Ignore it. That comment really doesn't apply to this case. That's for things >> that only make sense in the language or standard library, like context managers. >> For libraries like this, Steven's summary is correct. It needs to have a useful >> life as a third party package for a few years before you should propose it for >> inclusion into the standard library. By all means, distribute a design document >> for comment before you implement things; it's a reasonable practice. But don't >> bother with a PEP yet. > > So, I went and re-read PEP 1, and in the fine print it directs me to > PEP 2. Mea culpa -- I though I understood the PEP. > > Nonetheless, the fact that I created what I call a "PEP draft" seems > to have had more read into it than I meant. I will bear this in mind > when I start future projects. I have a couple of projects, and > contribute to another, which in no way should wind up in the standard > library. But I find the lack of a good, up-to-date, configuration > reader in the library to be an issue, which is why I had the temerity > to try to start a discussion on what a good standard configuration > file reader should be. > > Yes, I would like to create something compelling enough to go into the > standard library. No, I don't expect it to wind up there for a very > long time, if ever. BUT, at the same time, following the PEP format > is very valuable for my project. It forces me to think more deeply > about the problem I am solving and it forces me to write down some > documentation. Really, it's no more burdensome than any other similar > useful template. Certainly. The PEP format is a useful one. I've used it myself for some numpy design documents. But can you see why people might get confused about your intentions when you call it a draft PEP and post it to python-dev? If you stop calling it a PEP and stop talking about putting it in the standard library, people will stop being distracted by those issues. -- Robert Kern "I have come to believe that the whole world is an enigma, a harmless enigma that is made terrible by our own mad attempt to interpret it as though it had an underlying truth." -- Umberto Eco
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4