[skip at pobox.com wrote] > >> It does, in the "in-development" version of the documentation. Sorry it > >> was not in the 2.4 releases :-( > > Thomas> Maybe it can be backported to 2.4.2 - is there still time for that? > > Changed now in CVS. When 2.4.2 is released it should be there. Is this the same kind of thing as the (generally ill-regarded) change in Python 2.2.x (for some x != 0) that added: True, False = 0, 1 I may have the details wrong. Now there is a feature in 2.4.x that wasn't in 2.4.(x-1), which could cause surprises. I.e. I write code that uses the new thing, test it with my 2.4.2 install, think that is works with 2.4.* and say so when I distribute it. Maybe that is okay. Just asking here because I don't keep up with Python changes -- or sentiment on how to handle this kind of thing -- well enough. Trent -- Trent Mick TrentM at ActiveState.com
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4