On Thursday 01 September 2005 07:28 am, Fuzzyman wrote: > On 1 Sep 2005 00:52:54 -0700, "talin at acm dot org" > <viridia at gmail.com> wrote: > What's the difference between this and ``isinstance`` ? Other than proposing a keyword operator instead of a function, apparently nothing. isinstance() even checks for subclasses, if I'm not mistaken, so the semantics should be identical. I must confess that an "isa" operator sounds like it would have been slightly nicer syntax than the isinstance() built-in function. But not enough nicer to change, IMHO. Terry -- Terry Hancock ( hancock at anansispaceworks.com ) Anansi Spaceworks http://www.anansispaceworks.com
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4