RetroSearch Browse

Wed Sep 14 08:05:34 EDT 2005 · http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-list/2005-September/329805.html

Am Tue, 13 Sep 2005 07:01:57 -0700 schrieb TPJ:

>> Beside this, wxPython (and wxWidgets) is often told to be more complete,
>> better documented and better supported than GTK/PyGTK.
> 
> Is wxPython often told to be more documented? By who?
> 
> Several months ago I wanted to choose a nice GUI for Python (Tkinter
> was out of question). I choosed PyGTK for one reason - it was much,
> much better documented than wxPython.

Yes, the pyGTK documentation ist good. For me, the pyGTK API is
easier than the API of wxPython. 

I switched from wxPython to pyGTK.

I don't know if you can create standalone applications
for windows, without installing gtk on the client.

 Thomas

-- 
Thomas Güttler, http://www.thomas-guettler.de/
E-Mail: guettli (*) thomas-guettler + de
Spam Catcher: niemand.leermann at thomas-guettler.de

Home - News ( United States | United Kingdom | Italy | Germany ) - Football scores

Showing content from http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-list/2005-September/329805.html below:

PyGTK or wXPython?