Steven D'Aprano a écrit : > For some reason, the original post never made it to my newsreader, so > apologies for breaking threading by replying to a reply when I mean to > answer the original post. > > On Wed, 28 Sep 2005 12:05:21 +0100, Simon Brunning wrote: > > >>On 9/28/05, could ildg <could.net at gmail.com> wrote: > > >>>Python is wonderful except that it has no real private and protected >>>properties and methods. > > > Do you know any language that has real private and protected attributes? > > There may be some. I don't know. But anyone who says "C++" is fooling > themselves: > > #define private public #undef private :)
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4