A RetroSearch Logo

Home - News ( United States | United Kingdom | Italy | Germany ) - Football scores

Search Query:

Showing content from http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-list/2005-September/325546.html below:

Will python never intend to support private, protected and public?

Will python never intend to support private, protected and public?Christophe chris.cavalaria at free.fr
Wed Sep 28 08:43:41 EDT 2005
Steven D'Aprano a écrit :
> For some reason, the original post never made it to my newsreader, so
> apologies for breaking threading by replying to a reply when I mean to
> answer the original post.
> 
> On Wed, 28 Sep 2005 12:05:21 +0100, Simon Brunning wrote:
> 
> 
>>On 9/28/05, could ildg <could.net at gmail.com> wrote:
> 
> 
>>>Python is wonderful except that it has no real private and protected
>>>properties and methods.
> 
> 
> Do you know any language that has real private and protected attributes?
> 
> There may be some. I don't know. But anyone who says "C++" is fooling
> themselves:
> 
> #define private public

#undef private

:)

More information about the Python-list mailing list

RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue

Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo

HTML: 3.2 | Encoding: UTF-8 | Version: 0.7.4