A RetroSearch Logo

Home - News ( United States | United Kingdom | Italy | Germany ) - Football scores

Search Query:

Showing content from http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-list/2005-September/316358.html below:

Will python never intend to support private, protected and public?

Will python never intend to support private, protected and public? Will python never intend to support private, protected and public?Gregor Horvath g.horvath at gmx.at
Wed Sep 28 11:31:18 EDT 2005
Paul Rubin schrieb:
> 
> Name mangling is a poor substitute for private variables.  If you want
> to be able to share private variables with other classes under certain
> circumstances, it's better to use something like C++'s "friend"
> declaration, where you can export the variables to a specific other class.

That assumes that you always know for sure that the given variable will 
always be used as a private/friend variable in the lifecycle of the 
software.

Software is too complictated to know everything in advance.
"Software lives" and totalitarian laws destroy easy living.

--
Greg

More information about the Python-list mailing list

RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue

Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo

HTML: 3.2 | Encoding: UTF-8 | Version: 0.7.4