RetroSearch Browse

Mon Sep 19 08:56:53 EDT 2005 · http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-list/2005-September/309189.html

Hello,

>     "Is anyone truly attached to nested tuple function parameters; 'def
>     fxn((a,b)): print a,b'?  /.../
> 
>     Would anyone really throw a huge fit if they went away?  I am willing
>     to write a PEP for their removal in 2.6 with a deprecation in 2.5 if
>     people are up for it."

First I missed the def and thought "Oh no don't remove it
sometimes I pass a tuple to my functions".
But the I saw the "def" keyword and realized I never
used such a function syntax.

So, in one line (my mailer truncated it):

def fxn((a,b)): print a,b'

for removal, not:

'fxn((a,b)' function calls

I'm ok with removal.

bye by Wolfgang

Home - News ( United States | United Kingdom | Italy | Germany ) - Football scores

Showing content from http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-list/2005-September/309189.html below:

C#3.0 and lambdas