On Sunday 25 September 2005 22:30, Victor Ng wrote: > You could do it with a metaclass, but I think that's probably > overkill. OK. And thanks for the example :-). It looks simple enough... I didn't think the solution would be overly complex. And the RLock makes it easier than I anticipated - was RLock not in existance when Synch.py from the old Python metaclass tutorial/demo was written? > It's not really efficient as it's doing test/set of an RLock all the > time, but hey - you didn't ask for efficient. :) Hmm... efficient is good. I was planning to do something with some kind of lock, but I'm fairly new to multithreaded programming. What would be a more efficient way to accomplish this? - Michael
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4