Terry Reedy wrote: > "Tim Roberts" <timr at probo.com> wrote in message > news:9005i1hjg5mvde675nelgbig3s90470cql at 4ax.com... > >>"billiejoex" <billiejoex at fastwebnet.it> wrote: >> >>>Hi all. I'm sorry for a noob question like this but I'll try to ask it >>>anyway. >>>One of the greatest problem that may discourage a new user to choose >>>Python >>>language is it's interpreted nature. >> >>I doubt it. C#, VB.NET, VBscript, Javascript and Perl have not suffered >>from being interpreted. > > Nor has 386 'machine language' suffered from being interpreted, at a deeper > level, by microcode. I think both you and Paul may be missing Tim's point. I don't think he's talking about "suffering" in technical respects, like speed. He's talking about popularity. -- Robert Kern rkern at ucsd.edu "In the fields of hell where the grass grows high Are the graves of dreams allowed to die." -- Richard Harter
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4