A RetroSearch Logo

Home - News ( United States | United Kingdom | Italy | Germany ) - Football scores

Search Query:

Showing content from http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-list/2005-September/299759.html below:

Possible improvement to slice opperations.

Possible improvement to slice opperations.Patrick Maupin pmaupin at gmail.com
Tue Sep 6 09:34:02 EDT 2005
Ron Adam wrote:

>> This should never fail with an assertion error.  You will note that it
>> shows that, for non-negative start and end values, slicing behavior is
>> _exactly_ like extended range behavior.

> Yes, and it passes for negative start and end values as well.

Umm, no:

.>> for stride in [-3, -2, -1, 1, 2, 3]:
...     for start in range(-1,len(L)):
...         for end in range(-1,len(L)):
...             P = L[start:end:stride]
...             Q = [L[i] for i in range(start, end, stride)]
...             assert P==Q, [start, end, stride, P, Q]
...
Traceback (most recent call last):
  File "<stdin>", line 6, in ?
AssertionError: [-1, 0, -3, [9, 6, 3], []]

> Thanks again, this pretty much explains why slices opperate the
> way they do.  And it explains why the edge case's happen as well I think.

You're welcome.

Regards,
Pat


More information about the Python-list mailing list

RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue

Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo

HTML: 3.2 | Encoding: UTF-8 | Version: 0.7.4