On Thu, 25 Sep 2003 16:25:18 +0100, Peter Nuttall wrote: > On Thursday 25 Sep 2003 2:51 pm, Riccardo Attilio Galli wrote: >> On Thu, 25 Sep 2003 11:46:16 +0100, Peter Nuttall wrote: >> > if anyone has any comments I would like to see them. > <snip> >> >> peter, your program write 'e-mail' absolutely not rfc2822 compliant. > <snip> > Yeah, I thought It was not compliant. Thanks for the weblink. I have > changed it based on the standard and what you said, but I have a few > questions: > > 1. message-ID: I have written an few lines of code that have the date > and time on one side of a @ and the computer's name of the other. is > that OK? I'm in a hurry, so I can't loock at rfc. I think it's too simple. It should be something really hard to generate again. Look at some real e-mail you received. > 2. is there a better way to make the date string that the loop that I > have? Probably, but I can't tell it now. > 3. line length: Is having it set to 78 ok or is that 2 over the limit? It's over the limit. 78 is with \r\n. > Here is the new code: there's a bug here > while end == 0: > msg=raw_input() > > if msg=='': > if new_line_1=='1': If I would press enter in the first line, it raise a NameError (new_line_1 is not defined) So define it before the if. > Thanks again > > Peter Good luck, Riccardo -- -=Riccardo Galli=- _,e. s~ `` ~@. ideralis Programs . ol `**~ http://www.sideralis.net
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4