"Alex Martelli" <aleaxit at yahoo.com> writes: <snip> > # 4. special case, as you note, for string. stuff > L = map(string.capitalize, l) <snip> I feel that it ought to be possible to use type("").capitalize here, as one could do with a class method. Why is it not possible to get unbound methods from types? Should it be? -- Any opinions expressed are my own and not necessarily those of Roundpoint.
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4