A RetroSearch Logo

Home - News ( United States | United Kingdom | Italy | Germany ) - Football scores

Search Query:

Showing content from http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-list/2001-April/114915.html below:

Python Performance vs. C++ in a Complex System

Python Performance vs. C++ in a Complex System Python Performance vs. C++ in a Complex SystemMichael Hudson mwh21 at cam.ac.uk
Thu Apr 19 18:32:31 EDT 2001
Courageous <jkraska1 at san.rr.com> writes:

> In retrospect, it's the lack of a true continuation model in C++
> which is to blame.

Somewhat tangentially, I've been thinking a bit over the past few days
about what it would take to make Stackless Python interpreter *really*
nonrecursive (i.e. even for things like __cmp__ methods), and decided
that it probably would be less painful to write it in assembler than C
(I guess scheme or somesuch would be the best choice).  Particularly
if half decent performance was an issue.  C just doesn't support this
style of programming.

Cheers,
M.

-- 
  It could be argued that since Suitespot is infinitely terrible,
  that anything else, by very definition of being anything else,
  is infinitely superior.                -- ".", alt.sysadmin.recovery

More information about the Python-list mailing list

RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue

Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo

HTML: 3.2 | Encoding: UTF-8 | Version: 0.7.4