In article <oihmctopeloiihkfk3jb3icnvrdoemm402 at news.mbnet.fi>, Kristian Ovaska <kristian.ovaska at helsinki.fi> wrote: >list = [1,2,3,4] >not 5 in list >5 not in list > >Why is there a "not in" operator? For clarity? > >(Not that I oppose "not in" in any way. I like it. I'm just curious.) To me, "not x in list" is confusing--I read it as meaning the same thing as "(not x) in list" -- Barnabas T. Rumjuggler The women come and go, Speaking of the Regis Philbin Show -- Joe Frank
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4