"Alex Martelli" <aleaxit at yahoo.com> writes: > I've used it successfully (with my changes as incorporated) > under NT4 SP6 (I do have a recent 'Platform SDK' installed, > but I don't think it changes anything in this regard). Hmm - we're still having difficulties. For example, the accept() wrapper seems to return a native socket and not a TimeoutSocket. But at least for us (also NT4 SP6), the socket that accept() returns when the main socket was non-blocking is also non-blocking. Thus, when you later attempt to send/receive over it, you're non-blocking, but without the wrapper support of the TimeoutSocket class. This seems to particularly show up when trying to use this with Fredrik's XMLRPC library. We also seem to get a code 10022 but with why[1] set to "winsock error" rather than "Invalid argument" in the connect processing. It sounds like I'll just poke around a little more and see if I can summarize everything in one swoop. Thanks. -- -- David -- /-----------------------------------------------------------------------\ \ David Bolen \ E-mail: db3l at fitlinxx.com / | FitLinxx, Inc. \ Phone: (203) 708-5192 | / 860 Canal Street, Stamford, CT 06902 \ Fax: (203) 316-5150 \ \-----------------------------------------------------------------------/
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4