In article <mailman.988108355.14978.python-list at python.org>, vsl6 at paradise.net.nz says... > I have been trying to visualize some quite large python projects of mine, > some of which are python zope products. This is getting difficult and I > wanted to turn to something like UML, but was wondering does UML make sense > for Python. Specifically are there better ways to visualize and build > objects and associations for a typeless language like python? How would one > incorporate acquisition, both implicit and explicit, which is very much > unlike inheritence. I guess this is quite a loose question, but I was > wondering if other people use visualization tools in this environment. > > Mick > > > I think UML would be an excellent means of visualizing a large Python project. After all, UML is supposed to be language neutral and an attribute of a class is an attribute of a class, whether it's typed or not. I'm not familiar with the term "acquisition" in this context - do you mean something like a "has-a" relationship? Now all that's needed is a UML tool based on WxWindows or tkinter! Regards, Dave LeBlanc
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4