Andrew Dalke wrote: > I do remember a letter to the editor in CACM a few > years ago complaining about all the CS oriented computer > science languages which didn't have a very useful > feature in COBOL - a data type which understood that > leading zeros are important for identifier numbers. > Eg, 04/03/01 as a date or 001-453-23264 as a part > number. Eh? There already is a perfectly good data type for that -- a string. -- Erik Max Francis / max at alcyone.com / http://www.alcyone.com/max/ __ San Jose, CA, US / 37 20 N 121 53 W / ICQ16063900 / &tSftDotIotE / \ The public is a fool. \__/ Alexander Pope Crank Dot Net / http://www.crank.net/ Cranks, crackpots, kooks, & loons on the Net.
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4