"Aahz Maruch" <aahz at panix.com> wrote in message news:9bpho5$7j8$1 at panix2.panix.com... > In article <slrn9dv5st.68t.neelk at alum.mit.edu>, > Neelakantan Krishnaswami <neelk at alum.mit.edu> wrote: > > > >My personal suspicion (and this is just a guess) is that if > >syntactically lightweight generators and coroutines were added to > >Python, then the pressure for new features would fade. > > Generators (called "iterators") are going to be 2.2. They'll be more > powerful that Icon's generators; it's not clear whether they'll be a > full-fledged substitute for coroutines. Cool. Presumably for 2.2 they'll be in __future__? regards Steve
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4