RetroSearch Browse

Sun Apr 1 21:24:53 EDT 2001 · http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-list/2001-April/107487.html

On Sun, 1 Apr 2001, KEVIN wrote:

> First, thanks!
> 
> Second, why not 2.1?

1. Because if you haven't done any programming at all, you're not
   likely to have the tools or experience you'd need to build Python
   from the source code distribution, and the pre-built binary 
   available from ActiveState [1] is 2.0, not 2.1.
2. Because 2.1 is still in beta-test, whereas 2.0 is released.

[1] http://www.activestate.com/Products/ActivePython/index.html

-- 
Bob Kline
mailto:bkline at rksystems.com
http://www.rksystems.com

Home - News ( United States | United Kingdom | Italy | Germany ) - Football scores

Showing content from http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-list/2001-April/107487.html below:

I want to learn PYTHON!