"Ron Stephens" <rdsteph at earthlink.net> wrote in message news:3AD2619D.7928E33 at earthlink.net... > Please keep up the good work. I am open source and free software advocate who > loves ActiveState's products and wish them to make a lot of money. Please do > not criticize ActiveState. They are doing so much good for Python !!!! To > criticize them is most ungrateful and not wise at all, IMHO > To not criticize them, if one feels that they are doing something wrong, is even less wise. In this case, if they can sell something, make some money, and give back to the community that supports them, that's great. But, if in the process they are stepping upon a license (which it appears that they are not) they should be taken to task. One should never cease being vigilant out of thanks, and it is good to look at these contracts that we live by and upon once in a while. As a side note, I'd like to raise the issue as to how much ActiveState feels this is the correct business model for them. Can we expect PythonWin or some other currently free (as in beer here) software to include a price in the future? Especially if ActiveState comes to be in charge of the Win32 distribution of Python, what is their incentive to keep giving? doug
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4