On Wed, 4 Apr 2001 15:53:01 -0400, "Tim Peters" <tim.one at home.com> wrote: >[Steve Holden] >> ... >> The future of the language is now (allegedly) in the hands of the >> Python Software Foundation, and ActiveState do seem to be supporting >> that quite actively. >> >> credit-where-credit-is-due-ly y'rs - steve > >Indeed, without Dick Hardt's personal and repeated efforts on its behalf, I >expect the PSF would still be just an idea. > >Speaking of which, for all *you* can tell, it's *still* just an idea ><wink/sigh>. The PSF was officially launched at the Python Conference, a >board of directors was elected, and some sponsors signed up. Unfortunately, >the minutes haven't been published yet because the Board has to approve >publication first, and it turns out the bylaws don't allow for any Board >decisions to be made via email. Or at least that's the latest procedural >glitch. Hang in there! Sigh. Standard boilerplate bylaws stuff; some states won't really let you get around it cleanly, either. Tell 'em to amend the bylaws to add a strongly worded "action without a meeting" section that allows for unanimous consent (even via email!) (assuming the bylaws let the board amend the bylaws). Been there, done that... Mats Wichmann (Anti-spam stuff: to reply remove the "xyz" from the address xyzmats at laplaza.org. Not that it helps much...)
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4