A RetroSearch Logo

Home - News ( United States | United Kingdom | Italy | Germany ) - Football scores

Search Query:

Showing content from http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-list/2001-April/102368.html below:

1.6 vs 2.1 (was Re: syntax from diveintopython)

1.6 vs 2.1 (was Re: syntax from diveintopython) 1.6 vs 2.1 (was Re: syntax from diveintopython)Alex Martelli aleaxit at yahoo.com
Wed Apr 18 08:46:32 EDT 2001
"iddwb" <iddwb at imap1.asu.edu> wrote in message
news:Pine.LNX.4.21.0104180243040.6996-100000 at moroni.pp.asu.edu...
    [snip]
> I grabbed the rpm for python 1.6.  I'm so new to the language that I
> didn't see why 2.x would help.  I'm still trying to overcome years of
> Rexx.  anyway, comments appreciated.

1.6 has been called "the Contractual Obligations release" -- something
Guido et al HAD to do for legal/contractual reasons.  I do not know of
ANY case where its use would be recommended.  Get 2.1... fewer bugs, more
attuned to the training materials you'll find around, etc, etc -- surely
these are traits that WOULD help even one new to the language, no?


Alex




More information about the Python-list mailing list

RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue

Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo

HTML: 3.2 | Encoding: UTF-8 | Version: 0.7.4