Carlos Ribeiro wrote:
>It would be a *lot* easier if strings had a reverse method, or if the
>reverse() methods returned the reversed string. However, similarly to
>sort(), the Python-way-of-doing-things must have some good reason for
>reverse() to behave this way (as a inplace operation on the list).
Lists have a reverse method because lists are mutable.
Consider strings as more akin to tuples. Both are immutable.
Andrew
dalke at acm.org
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4