>>>>> Erik Max Francis <max at alcyone.com> writes: >> "Fernando RodrÃguez" wrote: Erik Max Francis <max at alcyone.com> wrote: >> >> Why do you think it's SO wrong? >> It's a horribly bad idea if they actually expect the language to become >> widely used commercially. With such licensing they are guaranteed to >> drive companies away from using it. No one wants to start using a >> for-the-Web language where they have to pay _per hit_. Actually, it has mostly been individual programmers who seem to dislike this pricing scheme; we have found that businesses are fairly open to it. Companies doing business on the web already pay huge amounts of money for development tools, server hardware/software and maintenance, and for internet connectivity. Unlike other development tools, Curl technology costs nothing until you actually put it into the field and then what you pay is proportional to your other web-hosting costs. By using Curl, you can push more of your functionality from the server to the client and therefore require less work from your servers. You can also deliver content to your end-users using fewer number of bytes so you don't need to buy as much network bandwidth. The net result is that you should actually save money using Curl technology to build and distribute web content. - Christopher
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4