Tim; Thanks for the opinion (grin) I was not shure weather Python was GPL or not. Of course I would not take a usenet statment as final, and if I get the job I will be talking with the lawyers. Sam Schulenburg In article <mailman.987882691.3199.python-list at python.org>, Tim Peters <tim.one at home.com> writes: >[Sam Schulenburg] >> I recently had an interview with a prospective employer, who stated >> that their product used windows NT, and their license agreement with >> Microsoft prohibited the inclusion of GPL licensed software being >> shipped with their product. My question is Python included in that >> or not? >> All opinions welcome. > >Opinions are worthless, including your employer's: tell your prospective >employer to have their lawyer look at both the MS license and Python's. >Python is not released under the GPL, and that much is a fact, but your >understanding of your prospective employer's understanding of the true >legalities is probably fatally flawed at both stages <0.4 wink>. > >usenet-is-no-substitute-for-putting-a-lawyer's-kids-thru-college-ly > y'rs - tim > > "Sam Schulenburg" <samschul at pacbell.net> wrote in message news:7UkE6.31$gp2.51794 at news.pacbell.net... > I recently had an interview with a prospective employer, who stated that > their product used windows NT, and their license agreement with Microsoft > prohibited the inclusion of GPL licensed software being shipped with their > product. My question is Python included in that or not? > All opinions welcome. > > Sam Schulenburg > > >
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4