Bob Cannard wrote: > No, Dennis, it's not a product of poor design. It's a product of > examining many problems with clear eyes, without the distorting > lens of a widely-accepted but insufficiently questioned dogma. fwiw, I'm not so sure about "insufficiently questioned". lots of post-Pascal SP work fully support your view. see e.g: "Loop Exits and Structured Programming", by Eric Roberts: http://www.seas.smu.edu/~kornerup/cse1341/robertsfiles/documents/loopexit.txt "At all levels of experience, students using [a version of pascal supporting internal loop exits] were more likely to write correct programs than were their counterparts in the control group" in python 3000, expect "while" to be replaced with "loop/if/break" ;-) Cheers /F
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4