> Why is there a "not in" operator? For clarity? > (Not that I oppose "not in" in any way. I like it. I'm just curious.) We also have "x != y" in addition to "not x == y" :)
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4