On Wed, 4 Apr 2001 09:33:07 +0200, Alex Martelli <aleaxit at yahoo.com> wrote: > > I suspect spaces (or underscores?) within _numeric literals_ might > prove more popular -- I'd LOVE to be able to write, e.g.: > > a = 1 000 000 000 > > to make the number "one billion" more legible -- but maybe it's not > as good an idea as it seems at first glance: if the number of digits > between separating spaces was not checked, it might be misleading; > if it WAS checked, then I'm not sure that "three by three" is OK in > all locales (but maybe non-US locales need not be supported here, > just as they aren't, for example, for decimal-point). I agree about commans, but I don't like using spaces; Ada's solution of permitting underscores '_' inside numeric literals is a nice compromise between the limitations of ASCII and the limitations of human readers. So the above might be written a = 1_000_000_000 which is fairly readable and culture non-specific. (Though using commas as decimal-points is even more brain-damaged than using periods, which just shocks me -- what's that about fine European design again? ;) Neel
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4