On Tue, 10 Apr 2001 18:55:36 +0200, Michael Ströder <michael at stroeder.com> wrote: >I'm currently doing something like this code below to make sure that >locks are released also in case of any exception raised: > >my_lock = threading.Lock() > >my_lock.acquire() >try: > ..some single action.. >except: > my_lock.release() > raise >my_lock.release() > >But this looks crude to me. Any more elegant way of doing this? This is just the sort of situation that the try...finally sequence was designed for. See: http://www.python.org/doc/current/ref/try.html and have a look at the last two paragraphs. Regards, Matt
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4