RetroSearch Browse

Wed Apr 18 00:23:56 EDT 2001 · http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-list/2001-April/092681.html

"news-server.columbus.rr.com" <antediluvianistic at columbus.rr.com> wrote in
message news:gz3D6.111321$BB5.897657 at typhoon.columbus.rr.com...
> Has everyone contemplated upon creating a python 'compiler',  which can
> produce a self-contained binary executable?

import os
name = argv[1]
outfile = open('%s.c' % name, 'w')
infile = open('%s.py' % name, 'r')
outfile.write("""
  #include "Python.h"

  int main()
  {
    Py_Initialize();
    PyRun_SimpleString(%s)
    Py_Finalize();
    return 0;
  }
""" % infile.read())
infile.close()
outfile.close()
system('gcc -o %s %s.c' % (name, name))

>  (for when speed is an absolute
> neccessity)

A self-contained executable is no guarantee of speed.  I recently found that
even with extensions(*) in C++ (with Boost.Python), Python is too slow for
my own current game project.  I've since converted all of the Python code in
that project to C++.

*: There is a possibility that the real culprit was the binding between C++
and Python.  There is also the possibility that reshuffling some code to or
from the extension modules would have allowed me to keep using Python.  I
decided not to risk it; it only took three days to convert the Python code
to C++.

--
Rainer Deyke (root at rainerdeyke.com)
Shareware computer games           -           http://rainerdeyke.com
"In ihren Reihen zu stehen heisst unter Feinden zu kaempfen" - Abigor

Home - News ( United States | United Kingdom | Italy | Germany ) - Football scores

Showing content from http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-list/2001-April/092681.html below:

Python compiler?