On Wed, 18 Apr 2001 17:41:50 -0400, D-Man <dsh8290 at rit.edu> wrote: >On Wed, Apr 18, 2001 at 01:40:53PM +0200, Martin von Loewis wrote: >| I disagree. In Smalltalk, which is one of the oldest OO languages, the >| object being dealt with is always referred-to as "self". Even in a >| natural language, the actor always refers to the subject of an action, >| even if the subject is the actor ("I understand this", not "Understand >| this"). >Only in English. In other languages (Spanish comes to mind, I don't >really know any others but AFAIK all Romance languages are identical >in this regard) the verb changes to indicate the subject. Dare I mention, though, that at least one language constructed to be simple and regular, Esperanto, does indicate self? :) Mi komprendas cxi tio. Of course I am a bit rusty so that is most likely wrong. :) -- Steve C. Lamb | I'm your priest, I'm your shrink, I'm your ICQ: 5107343 | main connection to the switchboard of souls. -------------------------------+---------------------------------------------
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4