Why couldn't you just say that "all control statements in Python are dedented, end with a :" _because they_ "have code following the statement."? So if one would be created that doesn't have code following, there would be no need for it to end with a ":" and it could be dedetended from the other end... Andrew Dalke wrote: > The other one is that no one could think of a nice way to > do the indentation given that it requires two control statements, > and all control statements in Python are dedented, end with a : > and have code following the statement. The "until" clause > breaks one of those, unless you always follow it with a dummy > "pass" statement.
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4