[Steven D. Majewski] > Obviously a performance hit, but if you want readability: > > >>> def Number( *args ): > ... t = 0 > ... for x in args: > ... t = t * 1000L > ... assert 0 <= x < 1000, 'Out of range' > ... t = t + x > ... return t > ... > >>> Number( 1,000,000 ) > 1000000 > >>> Number( 1,234,567) > 1234567 > >>> Number( 1,200,300,400,500 ) > 1200300400500L > >>> Number( 1,200,300,400,500.25 ) > 1200300400500.25 > > Of course, you can also have confusing things like: > > >>> Number( 1,2,3 ) > 1002003 That's not confusing. This is <wink>: >>> Number(1,064) 1052L >>> hard-to-believe-that-semantically-significant-leading-zeroes- ever-seemed-like-"a-good-idea"-to-anyone-ly y'rs - tim
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4