-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 > What? How does anything you wrote support the assertion that changing a > single letter of a work in the public domain entitles you to a > legitimate copyright claim in the derived work? Go read cluase 2 of the GPL. Its pretty clear what I wrote supports that the use of GPL code in any application public domain or NOT, will be under a GPL copyright. And next time I send a private mail to you offlist, respect the fact that it's offlist. Thanks. ============================================================================= - -Chris Watson (316) 326-3862 | FreeBSD Consultant, FreeBSD Geek Work: scanner at jurai.net | Open Systems Inc., Wellington, Kansas Home: scanner at deceptively.shady.org | http://open-systems.net ============================================================================= WINDOWS: "Where do you want to go today?" LINUX: "Where do you want to go tomorrow?" BSD: "Are you guys coming or what?" ============================================================================= irc.openprojects.net #FreeBSD -Join the revolution! ICQ: 20016186 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.0.4 (FreeBSD) Comment: Made with pgp4pine 1.75-6 iD8DBQE61I5koTcdKVapx58RAt0dAJ4iX+IvyK6F5NTa/m/J3dZs/uF6MwCePaYD wnB5xiBYmlWHAYDVmY78RLw= =iFib -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4