Michael Hudson <mwh21 at cam.ac.uk> wrote: >"Mike C. Fletcher" <mcfletch at home.com> writes: > >> I _think_ (not really sure, as never used it) that bytecodehacks >> provides an "assembler" language for Python. Project is at: >> http://bytecodehacks.sourceforge.net/ > >It's a bit of a joke, and the bytecodehacks are somewhat out of date >(sorta work with Python 2.0, probably die horribly with 2.1). I >haven't really had any motivation to hack on the bytecodehacks lately. >I might get another rush of enthusiasm at some point, but don't hold >your breath. There are several people maintaining products that depend on bytecodehacks, so its not going to die for a while. Im not aware of any that were pushing the 2.1 bleeding edge, but Im sure bytecodehacks will catch up eventually. Toby Dickenson tdickenson at geminidataloggers.com
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4