In article <9absjh$4dcfa$1 at ID-59885.news.dfncis.de>, Thomas Heller <thomas.heller at ion-tof.com> wrote: >Places to start: > >http://starship.python.net/crew/theller/py2exe/ >and >http://www.mcmillan-inc.com/install1.html Thanks! Neither is quite what I want (even py2exe, despite being incredibly cool, can't link pythonXX.dll into the resulting executable statically) but both are major steps in the right direction. If I can get Freeze to do static linking on Windows --- ideally only of the modules my program uses --- I will be happy. I know this is a more demanding and inefficient level of integration than most Windows programs have, but I want my stuff to be a lot easier to install and uninstall than the average Windows program. I want someone to be able to download a single .exe file from a web site and run it and have my program work; then I want them to be able to delete the file to uninstall the application, leaving behind only files they asked the program to create during its execution. I could have a much smaller executable (or Python script) for people who already have Python installed. -- <kragen at pobox.com> Kragen Sitaker <http://www.pobox.com/~kragen/> Perilous to all of us are the devices of an art deeper than we possess ourselves. -- Gandalf the White [J.R.R. Tolkien, "The Two Towers", Bk 3, Ch. XI]
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4