On Wed, 4 Apr 2001, Tim Peters wrote: > > That's not confusing. This is <wink>: > > >>> Number(1,064) > 1052L > >>> > > hard-to-believe-that-semantically-significant-leading-zeroes- > ever-seemed-like-"a-good-idea"-to-anyone-ly y'rs - tim > GROAN! Well -- it worked for all my test cases! ( Doesn't that sound familiar! ) I'm sure glad I was just giving free advice and not trying to do something with it myself! ;-) -- Steve.
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4