Its possible to do this: print "%d %d" % (1,2) but not this: print "%d %d" % [1,2] Why? I know I can convert the list to a tuple. I want to know if there is a reason for % not taking lists as well as tuples. Does anyone else think it would be a good idea of the % operator were extended to also handle lists? -Ram
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4