Ben Wolfson wrote: > Easily, if unreadably, solved: (condition and (a,) or (b,))[0] Sure, but unfortunately the unreadable part defeats the whole purpose for wanting a conditional operator in the first place :-). -- Erik Max Francis / max at alcyone.com / http://www.alcyone.com/max/ __ San Jose, CA, US / 37 20 N 121 53 W / ICQ16063900 / &tSftDotIotE / \ If I had known, I would have become a watchmaker. \__/ Albert Einstein blackgirl international / http://www.blackgirl.org/ The Internet resource for black women.
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4