Chris wrote: > I submit that the "hacker ethic" is the real protection here anyway, because > if a "big guy" steals a major piece what if "hackers" working for a big GPL guy takes your non-GPL'd open source code, makes a usually trivial change, and instead of contributing the change back to the original author, they redistribute the result as their own code, under GPL? has happened to me many times... (and for some reason, non-GPL folks never do things like that. go figure) Cheers /F
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4