Sheila King wrote: > > Less system overhead? That is exactly the opposite > information from what I got, > [..] > And I'd have to say that my experimenting confirms this. Hmm, might be indeed less latency to call the sendmail executable than doing the whole SMTP connection. Personally I'm a little bit scared about forking shells in a CGI-BIN (system overhead). And I don't like to install a MTA on all web servers. > And, in the case that someone uses the smtplib option in my script, rather > than the sendmail option, my script has to go to a lot more trouble to set the > envelope sender and recipient, the date field, the message-ID and so forth > myself. Not really. In my case the MTA does all stuff itself. Setting From: and Subject: lines was sufficient. > Are you suggesting just using the smtplib and tossing the sendmail part of the > script? Your mileage may vary. Ciao, Michael.
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4