"Luke" trolls again: > Java's system works just fine. It is assumed when you are writing a class, > that a variable is part of that class. It makes more sense. After all why > wouldn't you assume first that a variable that is part of a class belongs to > that class. If you are dumb and want to put an identical variable in a local > scope in a function, for example, then you use this.foo to distinguish. Java > is more logical IMHO looks like you haven't studied Python's class model close enough to actually know what you're talking about here... (hint: how do you declare class members in Python?) Cheers /F
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4