"Jeremy Hylton" <jeremy at digicool.com> wrote in message news:mailman.987654387.28996.python-list at python.org... > >>>>> "RD" == Rainer Deyke <root at rainerdeyke.com> writes: > > RD> def f(): > RD> class C: > RD> pass > RD> C() > > RD> This is, incidentially, the idiom I had to use extensively to > RD> deal with the lack of nested scoping in Python. More generally, > RD> you write a class for which subclasses don't make sense. > > It's former lack of nested scopes, I believe ;-). > Perhaps you meant "before its implementation of nested scopes in the __future__"? regards Steve
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4