"Neal Norwitz" <neal at metaslash.com> wrote in message news:3AD752A0.ECF538A4 at metaslash.com... [snip] > There are many cases where you want to write completely legal code, > but checker can't tell if it is a bug (thinko mistake) or what was intended. > Ideally, there would be finer grain control on the options. [snip] > One option would be to review the actual doc strings and look for hints > (similar to lint /*ARGSUSED*/). Perhaps "CHECKER.initsubclass = 1" ? > > Any ideas or comments? Exactly: I'd put the hints in comments (rather than in docstrings)...:-). Alex
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4