----- Original Message ----- From: "Brandon J. Van Every" <vanevery at 3DProgrammer.com> Subject: Re: [ANNOUNCE] Umbra role-playing game 0.2 pre-alpha > "Chris Gonnerman" <chris.gonnerman at usa.net> wrote in message > news:mailman.987738512.19013.python-list at python.org... > > > > I'm not sure how it's a consequence. Your copyright protects you exactly > > as much with or without the source code. Ignoring patches/diffs is about > > as hard as ignoring spam (which I'm sure you do every day, just like me). > > Is that a deliberately dumb comment, or are you just unaware that one of the > rights of copyright is the right to make derivative works? Let's not get rude, even in a divisive thread like this. The beauty of this list has always been the politeness (esp. compared to certain other language- oriented newsgroups/lists). Yes, I am aware of that fact, and I am also aware that the right is not automatically granted. If he writes his license correctly (from his POV, allowing no derivative works) then my assertion is correct. Or are you saying I have misunderstood something else? After all, I am no lawyer. > It is way easier > to make a derivative work if you have the source code. In the real world, > if it's easier for someone to transgress, then your copyright enforcement > problem is more difficult. True. But in the real world, harder transgressions simply attract more determined transgressors. As our friend Kamikaze says, there are tools to help decompile his code, leading to his cranky reaction.
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4