"Remco Gerlich" <scarblac at pino.selwerd.nl> wrote in message news:slrn9eg5uc.34r.scarblac at pino.selwerd.nl... [snip] > Does anyone have any numbers on this? People make this claim all the time, > but in practice my typos are always caught at compile time or immediate > testing already. I believe bugs like this are really rare. I think the recent reports of PyChecker runs on the Python libraries do offer one data point on that, but I don't recall the numbers. > And similar to Alex's excellent rant, I hope people aren't trying to make > Python the one language to use for everything... Amen (& thanks for the 'excellent'!-). Alex
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4